A9 Alan Garcia

One reason why I would question the utility of Second Life is related to McLeod's comment that Second Life emulates pieces of the real world but allows users to be whatever they want to be. For the sort of simulations that could possibly be beneficial to run on Second Life, there is a likely risk that a user's behavior would deviate from the norm. In terms of communicating and collaborating in the Second Life, possible drawbacks include adoption. This game might be accessible to those with experience in video games, but otherwise the large range of controls and functions gives it a steep learning curve, as mentioned in some of the readings.

On the other hand, there would be benefits if these varying identities were used on an individual level to experiment with elements of confidence or decision making. The fact that Second Life allows users to take control of their sense of place could give advantageous insights into certain simulated situations. For example, aggression or outspokenness could be traits that a character portrays which his owner does not. In terms of collaboration, a benefit of Second Life is the workspace and presence awareness that is provided. Information such as when members of your group are busy and what activity they are involved in are readily available.

An ideal use of Second Life might be an elementary or middle school after-school meeting. In this environment it would be important to have awareness and identity for everyone. Additionally, because children are very particular about their attention spans, a 3D simulated game would likely contribute to their interest. Finally, children are immersed in technology very early nowadays, thus the learning curve could be attacked much more efficiently.